-
Just as you shouldn't be surprised if no one notices any agreements you may have with Democrats Jolie when 99% of the articles you post are against Dems.
Not Dems so much as fanatical liberals... fanatics of just about any stripe.
Why should I waste time on posting about Repulican screw ups ( although I have ) when certain members get such joy from doing so ? You wouldn't want me to ruin their fun, would you ??
Bahet, you haven't really been here that long, maybe you should read more of my postings before you pass judgements on me....
Laissez les bon temps rouler! 
Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! 
Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?
-
-
12-30-2007 11:22 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
Originally Posted by
Jolie Rouge
Seriously, I certainly have not agreed with Bush nor his adminitration on all things. I simply refuse to name call when I disagree with someone, and expect a certain level of respect for the Office if not the person of the POTUS. There have been a number of time I have posed critical analysis of the current admin, but certain members here only seem to pay attention when I am disagreeing with them.
I respect the office. I have zero respect for the person currently in it.
You brought up adultry here not me.
Making a point that it's brought up all the time by the other side. Didn't know I was supposed to wait for it.
It is one of the symptoms of BDS.
Note that none of the ABB Crew has a problem with Clinton claiming that he ordered the CIA to assassinate Bin Ladin - a violation of international law and Geneva Conventions. They also seem to have to problems with his purjury on national TV (repeatedly) or ransacking the White House for furniture and US heirtage.
Again, what is BDS? And what is ABB?
Clinton can do no wrong.
Bush can do nothing right.
The facts are immaterial.
Clinton did plenty wrong. I never said he didn't. I haven't found much Bush did right although I did fully support him after 9/11 when he wanted to attack Afghanistan. Then, 6 months after 9/11, he said he didn't care about OBL and invaded a country totally innocent of the 9/11 attacks and he lost my support again.
The facts are most definitely material. I don't vote party line. I vote for the person who will do a good job or at least screw me the least. It seems the facts are immaterial on the other side though as they are the ones who chastize Clinton for not going after OBL but have no problem with Bush all but ignoring him even after 9/11. I also don't recall ever seeing you say anything you specifically like about any Dem, posting any article in favor of any Dem, posting any article against any Republican, or saying anything specifically against any Republican. Perhaps that's that 1% I'm missing though.
-
-
Incidentially, I'm not passing judgements. I'm making observations. There is a difference. I'm not pigeonholing you as a person but only noting the actions I've observed.
-
-
Ever since they started saying (on the news) that the surge was working and we were winning the war I lost interest. Bush is almost out so discussing him is (IMO) futile. And the candidates all seem like it's not about "who will run this country well" but "who will screw it up the least".
It doesn't matter who you vote for NOTHING is really going to change.
Looking for Sympathy? It's in the Dictionary between Sh!t and Syphilis.
-
Reply With Quote